Write down the reasons to change
Turn broad dissatisfaction into concrete examples: missing interview context, scattered notes or repeated entry. Separate configuration, training, missing functions, commercial terms and data requirements.
Define the outcome you want. Some issues can be fixed in the current tool; others justify a change. Otherwise the same habits may simply move into a different interface.
Clarify what French means
Interface language, vendor location and processing locations differ. Review the specific offer, options, DPA and subprocessors.
GDPR Articles 28 and 44 onwards address processing arrangements and transfers. A flag cannot replace this assessment.
Compare evidence
Request the same dated information from shortlisted vendors. Distinguish promises, documents and tested behavior. Do not attribute unverified limitations to competitors whose offers may change.
| Area | Evidence | Test |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow | Included capabilities. | A complete application journey. |
| Data | DPA, providers and locations. | Permissions and request handling. |
| AI | Uses, limitations and documentation. | Explanations and original documents. |
| Price | Current conditions and capacity. | Your actual total cost. |
| Exit | Formats and recovery scope. | A representative export. |
| Support | Channels and conditions. | Answers to concrete questions. |
Repeat a representative recruitment
Use a fictional vacancy and records with HR and a manager. Review a CV, prepare a question, leave feedback and identify the next action.
Include incomplete applications, rescheduling and rejection communication. Agencies should also test assignments, approved presentations and client feedback rather than only a company pipeline.
Apply the same scrutiny to AI
A French model does not alone establish where processing occurs. Ask which service runs it, what is sent and which limitations are documented.
Check extraction, explanations and handling of missing information. aiKip describes its indicative analysis and remaining work on its transparency page rather than promising perfect AI.
Prepare exit and migration
Confirm your current contract’s recovery scope, formats, timing and limitations. Inspect a representative export and the relationships between jobs, applications and documents.
Do not assume another ATS can reconstruct every history automatically. aiKip migration arrangements should be confirmed for the actual case; CV reading is not universal competitor-data import.
Include internal work in cost
Fix users, vacancies and candidate capacity, then include preparation, training and necessary options. Check monthly or annual conditions.
A lower subscription may require extra manual work; unused modules may provide little value. Compare aiKip company and agency plans according to their different scopes.
Make a shared, documented decision
Record met requirements, accepted trade-offs and unresolved issues. This makes the choice explainable to users.
If aiKip fits, begin with representative recruitment and clear team rules. The change should improve understandable records, ownership and candidate responses as well as presentation.
Frequently asked questions
Is every French ATS hosted in France?
Check the actual offer and processing chain. Vendor location and interface language are insufficient.
Should we leave the current tool immediately?
No. Test alternatives and confirm exit and migration arrangements first.
Why include aiKip?
It combines French hosting, assisted AI, career pages and shared recruitment workflows. Evaluate its actual capabilities against your requirements.